Comments on: No-Numbers Geometry http://www.mickybullock.com/blog/2009/11/no-numbers-geometry/ Maths to the Masses Thu, 15 Jul 2010 08:23:09 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: rich http://www.mickybullock.com/blog/2009/11/no-numbers-geometry/comment-page-1/#comment-79 rich Sun, 13 Dec 2009 22:25:10 +0000 http://www.mickybullock.com/blog/?p=554#comment-79 didnt use the hexagon. just slammed some right angles into the pentagon. bang. didnt use the hexagon.

just slammed some right angles into the pentagon. bang.

]]> By: Micky http://www.mickybullock.com/blog/2009/11/no-numbers-geometry/comment-page-1/#comment-78 Micky Sun, 13 Dec 2009 21:30:44 +0000 http://www.mickybullock.com/blog/?p=554#comment-78 well done Rich. Now, did you use the hexagon or not? there are two ways to the solution. one ignores the hexagon completely well done Rich. Now, did you use the hexagon or not? there are two ways to the solution. one ignores the hexagon completely

]]> By: rich http://www.mickybullock.com/blog/2009/11/no-numbers-geometry/comment-page-1/#comment-77 rich Sun, 13 Dec 2009 20:47:33 +0000 http://www.mickybullock.com/blog/?p=554#comment-77 bla bla bla bla your comment is too short 144 bla bla bla bla your comment is too short

144

]]>